Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1699

reference
96-tree-1
name
1699
tree-preservation-order

undefined

96-tpo-1
uprn
100060433657
address-text
110C Hulbert Road, Havant, PO9 3TG
point
POINT (-1.006990 50.863673)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.006820 50.863655,-1.006828 50.863688,-1.006851 50.863719,-1.006888 50.863743,-1.006936 50.863759,-1.006988 50.863764,-1.007041 50.863760,-1.007089 50.863745,-1.007127 50.863721,-1.007152 50.863691,-1.007161 50.863658,-1.007153 50.863625,-1.007130 50.863594,-1.007093 50.863570,-1.007045 50.863554,-1.006993 50.863549,-1.006940 50.863553,-1.006892 50.863568,-1.006854 50.863592,-1.006829 50.863622,-1.006820 50.863655)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL